MCHUGH TO PLAY ROLE IN FATE OF PROPOSAL ON CLOSURE OF POSTAL FACILITIES by Marc Heller, Times Washington Correspondent First published: Saturday, June 7, 2003 WASHINGTON - Few issues are as unpopular in Congress as closing military bases. But base closures may come in handy for a new cause: shutting post offices. Some lawmakers are considering creating an independent commission, modeled after a base closure panel, to recommend post offices for closing. Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., is working on just such an idea, which he proposes as part of a larger package to revamp the U.S. Postal Service. The postal agency continues to struggle with lower-than-expected first class mail revenue and a dark outlook for its future finances. Under the proposal, the Postal Service would give Congress a plan for providing mail services - much as the Pentagon must submit a force structure plan before proposing bases for closure. The postal agency would also submit a list of postal facilities for closure, which would be reviewed by an independent commission. Rep. John M. McHugh, R-Pierrepont Manor, will play a role in the legislation's fate. He chairs a House panel on postal reform and has become the House's expert on the issue through several years of trying to pass a bill to help the agency survive in an era of electronic communication. The latest House effort failed in the Government Reform Committee last year. Mr. McHugh has fought against the closure of north country post offices, and Congress has forbidden closures for strictly financial reasons. But the congressman realizes that closures are one way the Postal Service can save money, said his deputy chief of staff, Dana L. Johnson. While Mr. McHugh does not have a specific formula in mind for shutting post offices, Ms. Johnson said, "They've got to raise revenue or reduce costs. Obviously, closing post offices is one way." The congressman has also advocated for "contract" post offices, in which the agency pays people to run post offices out their homes or businesses, for example. Ultimately, Ms. Johnson said, Mr. McHugh's goal is to maintain mail delivery to every address. But the Postal Service may need more bureaucratic freedom to guarantee that, she said. Mr. McHugh has worked with Mr. Carper on the legislation and welcomes the Senate's attention to the issue, Ms. Johnson said. "Congressman McHugh thinks it's a positive step forward," she said. "It's just a dialog that's long overdue." Congress is not likely to act on the measure before July, when a presidential commission is due to report on the state of the Postal Service and recommend reforms. E-mail: mheller@wdt.net