National
Association of Postal Supervisors
Legislative Update
June 25, 2007
In this edition:
- NAPS Endorses Harkin Bill to Ban Contracting Out
of
Delivery Services
- House Prepares to
Avoid Its Obligation to Repay the Postal Service (Again); NAPS and
Others Protest
- Triple-Play Postal
Hearings Set for July
- Legislative
Update on Bills Supported by NAPS
NAPS Endorses Harkin Bill to Ban Contracting Out of
Delivery Services
NAPS
has thrown its support behind
Senate legislation that would bar the Postal Service from expanding the
contracting out of mail delivery services.
NAPS’ endorsement of “The
Mail Delivery Protection Act of 2007” (S.
1457), a bill introduced by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), came in a June
14 letter
from NAPS President Ted Keating to Sen. Harkin.
Harkin’s bill would forbid the
Postal Service from entering into any contract with individuals and
firms for
the delivery of mail on any route with one or more families per mile. Keating called the legislation “fundamentally
necessary” and said, “Contracting out delivery services threatens to
undermine
the confidence of the American people and the integrity of the postal
system
itself …” “While the business case for
contracting out may appear initially attractive, the real costs of
contracting
out far outweigh the benefits. The costs
to the Postal Service in the degradation of service quality and
reliability
ultimately are greater than the savings achieved.”
The
Postal Service claims
that its
plans to expand the contracting out of delivery services are necessary
to control
costs. Those efficiencies are
achieved
largely through the use of low-wage, low-benefit, part time contract
carriers instead
of career Postal Service employees.
President Keating in his June 14
letter pointed to the supervisory downside of contracting out delivery
services, noting, “The experience of some managers in the supervision
of
existing contract carriers has been unfavorable.” “Contracting
out in some cases has resulted
in the responsibility for mail delivery ultimately falling to
supervisors
themselves, because of the failure of contracted carriers to arrive for
work or
to satisfactorily complete their contracted responsibilities. These circumstances have placed unnecessary
and unwarranted burdens upon postal supervisors, ones that rarely arose
when
USPS employee carriers were performing deliveries.”
In the House of Representatives,
Rep. Albio Sires (D-NJ) has authored H.
Res. 282, which condemns the practice
of contracting out and urges the Postal Service to halt the practice
immediately.
House Prepares to Avoid Its Obligation to Repay the Postal
Service (Again); NAPS and Others Protest
The Postal Service was dealt a financial blow by the House
Appropriations Committee on June 11 when the Committee voted to deny
the Postal Service its annual $29 million reimbursement to offset
Congressionally-mandated postage discounts to charitable organizations,
rural newspapers and mailings for the blind. The decision to deny the
Postal Service the so-called "revenue forgone" payment was made during
the House
Appropriations Committee's approval of the Fiscal Year 2008 Financial
Services and General Government Appropriation bill. Instead of
providing the Postal Service the expected funds, the House committee
directed the money towards increased funding for the Small Business
Administration.
The revenue forgone payment represents one of the only sources of
taxpayer funds received by the Postal Service. In 1993 Congress
established a revenue forgone funding schedule of $29 million per year
over 42 years to repay $800 million in back payments owed the Postal
Service for postage discounts mandated by Congress in 1970 for
charitable groups, national and state political parties, in-county
mailing of local newspapers, and other purposes.
Soon after the House Appropriations Committee action, Postmaster
General John Potter appealed
to the Committee, urging it to restore the revenue forgone payment,
and on June 20, NAPS and other postal employee organizations added
their voices. In a June
20 letter to the House Appropriations Committee, NAPS President
Ted Keating and the presidents of the other postal management
organizations and unions said, "This is a debt that the federal
government has been paying for the last 14 years." "It is a debt
on which the Federal Government has 28 more payments. It is a debt
that the Federal Government should continue to pay, until it is paid
off. It is difficult to see how the Congress can expect the Postal
Service to act responsibly, efficiently, and in the public interest
unless Congress is willing to do the same."
Other members of Congress agreed, including the top Democrat and
Republican on the House panel that oversees the Postal Service. Rep.
Danny Davis (D-IL) and Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX), the chairman and
ranking minority member of the House Subcommittee on the Federal
Workforce, Postal Service, and the District of Columbia, urged the
House Appropriations Committee to restore the revenue forgone payment
to the Postal Service in a June
18 letter to Rep. David Obey, chairman of the Appropriations
Committee.
Davis and Marchant pointed to the negative impact that lack
of revenue forgone funding will have upon the Postal Service, through
no fault of its own: "Failure to fund this authorized appropriation
places the remaining debt of more than $800 million at risk of
nonpayment, which would significantly increase postage costs. As the
Postal Service works to satisfy its long-term obligations in a
responsible manner, it would be counterproductive to increase those
costs through nonpayment of a debt. The failure to provide funds for
these services over time will require the Postal Service to record
these obligations as a bad debt and will unfairly transfer these costs
to postage ratepayers."
The FY 2008 Financial Services funding bill, the measure from which the
House Appropriations Committee has struck the revenue forgone funding
payment, is expected to come to the House floor soon, and the House
chamber is expected to stand by the Committee's action. That will
require the Postal Service and its supporters to seek a different
result the Senate, with inclusion of the revenue forgone payment in its
comparable funding bill. Last year the House of Representatives
similarly voted to refrain from making the revenue forgone payment to
the Postal Service, but the Senate overrode that action in its
appropriations measure, and the House ultimately agreed to restore the
funding in conference. NAPS and other groups will work to achieve the
same result this time once again.
Triple-Play Postal
Hearings Set for July
July will be a busy month on Capitol Hill for postal advocates. Before
Congress adjourns for the August recess, the House and Senate
subcommittees that oversee the Postal Service will hold three oversight
hearings on postal issues. They'll fall during a one-week period in
the second half of July. NAPS will testify at or closely monitor each
of these hearings:
- Thursday, July 19:
Postal contracting out and privatization - House
Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service, and the District of
Columbia
- Wednesday, July 25:
Postal oversight, featuring the views of postal management groups and
the postal employee unions - Senate Subcommittee on Federal
Financial Management of Government Information and National Security
- Thursday, July 26:
Postal delivery standards and infrastructure realignment - House
Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service and the District of
Columbia
Legislative Update on Bills Supported by NAPS
H.R. 728 - Veterans Reassignment Protection Act - The
legislation, which would protect postal supervisors who are military
veterans against arbitrary reassignments by the Postal Service and
assure veterans preference employment protections, now has 41
cosponsors (we need more!). To find out if your House
Member is a cosponsor of H.R. 728, click here.
To send a message to your House Member encouraging him or her to become
a cosponsor (it takes less than 2 minutes), click here,
insert your zip code, and send the message.
H.R. 281 - Universal Right to Vote by Mail Act - The bill
ensures the right to vote by mail in federal elections. It now
has 61 cosponsors. To find out if your Member of the House of
Representatives is a cosponsor, click here.
Again, to send a message to your House Member telling him or her to
become a cosponsor, click here,
insert your zip code, and send the message.
Social Security Fairness: H.R. 82, which would repeal
the Government Pension Offset and the Windfall Elimination Provision
Act, now has 319 cosponsors. To assure that your House Member is a
cosponsor, click
here. For cosponsor information on the 33 cosponsors of the
companion bill in the Senate, S. 206, click here.
Premium Conversion: There are now 210 cosponsors
in the House for H.R. 1110, and 40 cosponsors
in the Senate for S. 773.
Bruce
Moyer
Legislative Counsel to NAPS